X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
15th March 08, 10:59 AM
#24
 Originally Posted by cajunscot
I can't say I agree with that -- Matt's qualifications as a kiltmaker and a historian put his kilts squarely in the tank range, especially since the box-pleat was the fore-runner of the traditional knife-pleated kilt.
T.
But the term 'Tank' is not a technical term in the kilting world, from the FAQ:
A 'TANK' is defined as an eight-yard, wool, hand-sewn, traditional kilt. ie., "It's built like a tank." (coined by Jimmy Carbomb c.2005)
So by definition a Newsome 4 yard Box cannot be described as such. Traditional, hand sewn, wool yes but the beauty of the kilt is the construction requiring only 4 yards of material. This makes it a viable and affordable option for so many of us. I highly doubt I'll ever own a 'tank' but I'll agree that it most certainly is, as Jay noted, in a class of it's own. I'm proud to now be a part of a fortunate and select group lucky enough to own one.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Shriner in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 11
Last Post: 27th December 07, 09:45 AM
-
By Chase in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 32
Last Post: 27th October 07, 02:08 PM
-
By thescot in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 5
Last Post: 21st March 07, 12:45 PM
-
By wesd in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 4
Last Post: 5th December 06, 03:12 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks