X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
4th April 08, 07:16 PM
#34
 Originally Posted by cacunn
Why a new tartan was necessary or not is a question for those running the Castle. Corporation and other groups other change because they can or they may have seen a chance to get some publicity out of the new kilt to put in more tourist dollars. Maybe TFCK designed it on their own without the knowledge of the Historical Scotland group.
I see no problem with the original, in fact I like the tartan and think is should be worn as part of the Castle's history. But I don't think just because something is historical makes it better than something new or something new is better than historical just because it is new.
Change is hard to accept especially when it is hard to identify the need for the change.
I would echo Scotus comments; I see nothing wrong with a simple question as to why the new tartan was adopted.
I also agree with your last statement, which contradicts your first somewhat: without an answer as to why this tartan came about when HS already has a tartan, it is hard to explain the need for a change.
T.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Martin S in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 52
Last Post: 19th June 07, 04:39 AM
-
By Phil in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 6
Last Post: 22nd May 07, 11:52 AM
-
By Galant in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 12
Last Post: 13th April 07, 08:05 PM
-
By Pour1Malt in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 60
Last Post: 23rd October 06, 12:53 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks