X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
5th September 08, 05:09 PM
#9
For sure, Wallace. What I was trying to say was that genealogy is a science and it can be hugely frustrating for anyone if he mixes that up with sept-attachment. There's a heap of evidence supporting a Cattenach origin in Badenoch, and probably Lochaber, even before they appeared in Dee-side/Don-side in the early 15C (see my post 22 in this thread). That makes your attachment to Clan Chattan a foregone conclusion. But for someone with the name Gow, for example, the lists claim it to also be of Clan Chattan. There was a family named Gow in Badenoch, but the name is simply Gaelic (gobha) for smith and most glens had one of those. How frustrating for a Gow to spend years believing he is a Macpherson, only to successfully trace his ancestry to Argyll or Caithness!
-
Similar Threads
-
By 12stones in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 28
Last Post: 12th November 07, 01:49 PM
-
By bangkok kilt in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 8
Last Post: 3rd May 06, 04:56 AM
-
By David Thornton in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 23
Last Post: 21st September 05, 06:50 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks