I have no desire to argue this. It's all just "he said, she said." All I wanted to do was offer a perspective that was different from what is popularly held...at least in this society at this moment in time.

That said, I want to point out that if anyone takes a bare moment to think about it, I suspect that they will realize that the business with Lady Chrystal is a red herring. I never said anything about Lady Chrystal. Women do look good in kilts. She looks good in a kilt. Dustin Hoffman looked good in a dress.

The question is whether the kilt is a "man's garment" as everybody (almost without exception) on this forum so unequivocally asserts, or whether it is something else...or on the way to becoming something else.

Parenthetically...since many here wear the kilt to honour their Scottish ancestry...and ostensibly to show respect...let's ask our great-great-great-great grandfathers what they thought of women in kilts. Or ask their wives, for that matter.

Just two cents for the kitty...your mileage may vary.