|
-
1st April 09, 09:17 AM
#51
Here's another site that sells prints:
http://www.oldgloryprints.com/griffing.htm
-Aaron
-
-
1st April 09, 10:14 AM
#52
I do appreciate this thread, very educational for me. I had always liked Griffings works and I have wanted to use them as insperation for the old Eastern Woodland Indian style, but now I feel drawn to the highland regimental aspect of it. Thanks to you Historians onboard.
“Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.”
– Robert Louis Stevenson
-
-
1st April 09, 11:19 AM
#53
 Originally Posted by peacekeeper83
I do appreciate this thread, very educational for me. I had always liked Griffings works and I have wanted to use them as insperation for the old Eastern Woodland Indian style, but now I feel drawn to the highland regimental aspect of it. Thanks to you Historians onboard.
Since Griffing's Warriors is used as the book's cover illustration, let me throw in a plug for this new work of Native American historian Colin Calloway:
http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/genera...=9780195340129
It is well worth the price of admission!
Yours aye,
Todd
-
-
1st April 09, 04:46 PM
#54
Those of us that burn black powder knew exactly where you were coming from and where you were headed. I am in agreement that the prints are well researched. A number have been the cover on Muzzleloader Mag.
Keep your powder dry and flint sharp.
PPB
"A man's got to have a code, a creed to live by, no matter what his job." John Wayne
-
-
1st April 09, 06:57 PM
#55
I know some of the guys that Mr. Griffing used as models. Check out the website of The Eastern Woodlands Confederacy.
-
-
20th June 09, 03:34 PM
#56
 Originally Posted by Ted Crocker
After all, flat caps were historically worn with the kilt around the turn of the nineteen-hundreds, and there are photographs and probably paintings which demonstrate this; which is what got me in so much trouble with them. Just because something has been done or popular in the past, doesn't make it traditional or acceptable, as I understand it.
I suppose we do need a historical attire sub-forum because I don't think the historical and historical revival attire really belongs in the contemporary and non-traditional forum either...
1, that's not a flatcap, it's a typical balmoral, pulled forward. I wear mine like that often.
2, that's a standard late 18th C. Black Watch uniform, so yes, it is "traditional"
-
-
20th June 09, 04:00 PM
#57
A Tiny Point of Definitions
 Originally Posted by NNJCelt
2, that's a standard late 18th C. Black Watch uniform, so yes, it is "traditional"
...er, since that style of outfit isn't generally worn these days, it's more accurately described as "historical".
There is a great deal of interest in "historical" Highland attire and accoutrements within the X Marks community. It has been suggested (by me and others) that perhaps there should be a separate thread for discussing all of the historical stuff.
And welcome to X MARKS!!!! by the way.
-
-
20th June 09, 04:19 PM
#58
Last edited by Bugbear; 21st June 09 at 02:05 AM.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
20th June 09, 04:35 PM
#59
 Originally Posted by wvpiper
I live near a late 18th century fort that likes to do 'period' programs from time to time. I was thinking it would be neat to copy the above uniform for appearances and such.
Although it is a modern print, I was curious as to it's authenticity relating to the uniform of the Highland soldier in America in the mid to late 18th century.
From a civilian point of view, no the outfit is not traditional. From a military point of view, the outfit is as outdated as the weapon the fellow is holding. Is it authentic? I have no idea, but it does look to me as though he has just been kitted out by the quartermaster. Now, how often did that happen out there and in those days?
-
-
20th June 09, 06:54 PM
#60
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
From a civilian point of view, no the outfit is not traditional. From a military point of view, the outfit is as outdated as the weapon the fellow is holding. Is it authentic? I have no idea, but it does look to me as though he has just been kitted out by the quartermaster. Now, how often did that happen out there and in those days?
Actually, Jock, from a military historians point-of-view, it's quite good. And it's not really fair to call it "outdated", since the point of the painting is to illustrate an ordinary Highland soldier serving in North America during the Seven Year's War -- there's no need to state it is outdated given the subject matter.
The artist is well-respected in historical circles. Some of his works have been used by the National Park Service as illustrations. Are they 100% accurate? No, but they're "pretty darn close".
T.
-
Similar Threads
-
By GDub in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 23
Last Post: 29th March 09, 03:15 PM
-
By davedove in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 15
Last Post: 19th September 05, 05:21 PM
-
By Iolaus in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 1
Last Post: 5th May 05, 02:32 PM
-
By Manu in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 5
Last Post: 12th April 05, 07:53 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks