X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
View Poll Results: Better for a first kilt: Traditional or Contemporary?
- Voters
- 210. You may not vote on this poll
-
18th June 09, 10:03 AM
#1
Going with the standard that a "traditional" is a kilt with a traditional look, and a "contemporary" is a non traditional look, I have to go with the traditional.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with buying a budget kilt if that's what your wallet and lifestyle call for.
MUGs are not kilts. They are more kilt-like articles. I have nothing against people who choose to wear them, but I kinda feel like it's just an attention grabber if there's no history or tradition behind it. You wanna buck the status quo and not wear pants? Fine. Not having legs on your cargo shorts does not make them a kilt.
-
-
18th June 09, 08:14 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by St. Amish
...MUGs are not kilts. They are more kilt-like articles. I have nothing against people who choose to wear them, but I kinda feel like it's just an attention grabber if there's no history or tradition behind it. You wanna buck the status quo and not wear pants? Fine. Not having legs on your cargo shorts does not make them a kilt.
I feel sooooo ashamed!
-
-
18th June 09, 08:56 PM
#3
I thought the origins of kilt were Norse?
-
Similar Threads
-
By Peel in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 21
Last Post: 12th October 08, 08:20 PM
-
By ghostlight in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 69
Last Post: 28th April 08, 05:32 PM
-
By Piper in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 17
Last Post: 17th March 07, 03:54 AM
-
By Streetcar in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 16
Last Post: 23rd May 05, 08:35 AM
-
By Riverkilt in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 4
Last Post: 30th December 04, 07:20 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks