X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
14th August 09, 06:51 AM
#11
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
All this talk of district tartans is very interesting and somewhat theoretical and I think that, in some cases, their ancestry is actually older than some of the older clan tartans, I stand to be corrected on that point. However, in real life, certainly in the highlands, they are almost irrelevant. I know of no one here that would consider wearing a district tartan,other than in a pipe band, even if anyone knew that they actually exist and very,very few do.
I'm sorry, but I respectfully disagree Jock, as someone who wears two district tartans: one to honour the land where my immigrant ancestors settled, and the other which is actually my clan tartan.
To myself (and others I daresay) they are hardly irrelevant, but symbols of my pride in my ancestry and the accomplishments of my ancestors in their new country -- soldiers, farmers and educators, active in various civic, patriotic and fraternal organisations, Presbyterians, etc.
Please remember that for those who have no connection to a clan, but rather a connection a geographic location in Scotland, the district tartan is just as relevant.
Respectfully,
Todd
-
Similar Threads
-
By Kid Cossack in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 1
Last Post: 18th June 07, 08:48 AM
-
By starbkjrus in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 11
Last Post: 25th November 05, 05:25 AM
-
By arrogcow in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 8
Last Post: 31st May 05, 03:15 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks