-
11th October 09, 08:50 PM
#41
Izzy gives Prince Charles credit for being, er, ballsy enough to wear kilts in celebration of the union of Scotland and England, but he erred royally in combining a loud tartan with a bold argyle. Either the kilt or socks ought to have been muted or plain.
You see the thing is, he is clearly not wearing an Argyll. I would seriously doubt that he would ever wear an Argyll to a Black Tie affair. He is wearing a doublet and with the level of formality of the event his hose, sporran etc. while perhaps loud are in fact correct, plain or muted socks as he calls them would not be correct, diced hose as worn however are.
-
-
11th October 09, 08:59 PM
#42
So, mary-janes can be worn for black as well as white tie/jabot affairs? Ok, but I'm still not wearing them.
-
-
11th October 09, 09:01 PM
#43
Originally Posted by Jack Daw
So, mary-janes can be worn for black as well as white tie/jabot affairs? Ok, but I'm still not wearing them.
I've worn mine with my Prince Charlie jacket, they are appropriate.
-
-
11th October 09, 09:20 PM
#44
Buckled Evening Shoes
Originally Posted by Jack Daw
So, mary-janes can be worn for black as well as white tie/jabot affairs? Ok, but I'm still not wearing them.
Generally, unless one is dressing like a wee school girlie for halloween, the traditonal formal shoes worn with Highland attire (by gentlemen) are called either "buckled evening shoes" per the RROS dress regulations, or "Highland evening shoes" or "Highland dress shoes" by civilians.
As McMurdo has pointed out, Highland evening shoes are appropriate for both black tie and white tie events. Mary Janes, on the other hand, are more in keeping with being worn to the Artists and Models Ball.
-
-
12th October 09, 03:53 PM
#45
Originally Posted by Stratherrick
Jock
I take it that Marines consider themselves brothers in arms the world over!
Can the same can be said for US Navy Seals and the likes of the SBS and SAS, folks?
Slainte
Bruce
UGH! If I had a nickel for every bar fight or tussles that started out like this when I served
Just my opinion--nothing ever worn from my military service on any civilian attire.
No baubles, bangles or shiny bits attached to my lapels either. Maybe I'm becoming a curmudgeon, but I never saw the need to 'display' that I was a member of this or that.
[I][B]Ad fontes[/B][/I]
-
-
13th October 09, 03:33 AM
#46
Originally Posted by Urchurdan
Oh, and if its good enough for this fella, its good enough for me...
Prince Charles is very much a 'man of the people' and is interested in what people do and how they do it. If he is the Patron or member of an organisation he will wear the membership badge when next he visits them. He does this because it is important to the members of that organisation and Prince Charles knows it. We see him here at a highland games and the badges he is wearing would be of 'Scottish Country Pursuits'.
Regards
Chas
-
-
13th October 09, 07:00 AM
#47
Originally Posted by McMurdo
Izzy gives Prince Charles credit for being, er, ballsy enough to wear kilts in celebration of the union of Scotland and England, but he erred royally in combining a loud tartan with a bold argyle. Either the kilt or socks ought to have been muted or plain.
You see the thing is, he is clearly not wearing an Argyll. I would seriously doubt that he would ever wear an Argyll to a Black Tie affair. He is wearing a doublet and with the level of formality of the event his hose, sporran etc. while perhaps loud are in fact correct, plain or muted socks as he calls them would not be correct, diced hose as worn however are.
I believe the author "Izzy" of the caption quote was referencing HRH's hose with the term "bold argyle" as in argyle socks, not his doublet. I agree with you that the diced hose are de rigueur for the occasion.
Ken
"The best things written about the bagpipe are written on five lines of the great staff" - Pipe Major Donald MacLeod, MBE
-
-
13th October 09, 07:19 AM
#48
Originally Posted by HarborSpringsPiper
I believe the author "Izzy" of the caption quote was referencing HRH's hose with the term "bold argyle" as in argyle socks, not his doublet. I agree with you that the diced hose are de rigueur for the occasion.
Rereading it you are correct they were talking hose not doublet. I still think he looks just fine.
-
Similar Threads
-
By cavscout in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 10
Last Post: 25th February 06, 12:35 PM
-
By ReiverMaxwell in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 1
Last Post: 27th October 05, 03:37 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks