
That was hilarious.
I think you guys are missing the forest for the trees, though.
Setting aside a few key points:
I am a guy, and slouching with my legs spread is a God-Given Right.
I will never, ever wear "knee highs". They are for girls.
I have no idea who Tim Gunn is, and I don't care.
I am not a "lad". I am a "guy". On a good day, I might even be a "man".
"Spat" is the past tense of "spit", unless you are in Full #1 Dress or similar.
...I honestly don't see what the fuss is about. Yeah, some of the stuff he writes is a complete joke, but what he's saying
in general is turn yourself out well. If you're not in public, nobody cares...I wore my kilt, a two-tone sleeve skater shirt, and BTF flops over to a buddy's place last night. 'Course, it was also 2330 and our good friend JD was joining us

...but the key there is, not public, and among friends. In that case, my kilt is more like a towel that I can answer the door in, and @#$% if anyone else is uncomfortable, because while they're sitting in their own stink, I'm enjoying Scottish A/C. Going out in public? Put a little thought in to it. You wouldn't wear slacks with your pajama top, right?
May I quote? Thanks

...
Solid advice! I have noticed that within the supportive confines of this forum, it's very easy for us to think that anything goes, and assume that everyone else should just accept us in all our unconventional glory...and that's simply not realistic. Nowhere in any document does it state that anyone has any right to not be offended by anything, nor does it say that anyone is ever granted the right to be free from hearing that they're "doing it wrong".
...For example, what we're doing to this guy about his blog post.
"Don't be a buffoon" is as succinct as anyone could put it. So, why is it so hard a rule to follow? We're not immune, I'm sure I've done it myself, and we can all pull photos from the forum (but we're not gonna). It's already a difficult rule, in an environment he correctly identifies as being overly casual...but it's an
impossible rule to follow, if we're all entirely convinced of our own kilted cognizance and the duty of the general public to bask in our kilted glory.
I can think of a few more places than shower and garden, but I understand what he means.
No. My testicles will pursue their manifest destiny, I do not want them "pleasurably compressed", and I have never had a problem with
unintentionally flashing anyone.
Solid advice!
Besides, wasn't it just the other day that a bunch of kilted rabble claimed ignorance of t-shirts? If you're so top shelf that your only concept of a "t-shirt" is a white, short-sleeved cotton garment meant to be worn only under a buttoned dress shirt, then you surely understand what he's going on about in this paragraph. If not, then you
definitely need to understand what he's describing!
There is absolutely nothing off-mark about that paragraph, and any guy who aspires to be a well-dressed gentleman should keep it in mind.
BTW, the author quite bluntly states that he wears
skirts. BFD. I don't care what he wears, as long as he can tell a kilt from a skirt when he sees either, and doesn't confuse the two. His general fashion advice is sound, even if he gets a bunch of the kilted details all screwed up.
I am very leery of inviting a crossdresser to wear a kilt, particularly when he generalizes a dislike of hypermasculine kiltedness (I have never seen this, except in a couple UK commercials. The reality is not so!). The result I'm picturing is a caricature, and not complimentary to kilt-wearing in any way.
-Sean
Bookmarks