Quote Originally Posted by Bugbear View Post

Once again, the kilt is not described as tartan. The hose are, in this and the other quote, specifically described as tartan. The "plaid" is also described as tartan etc, but not the kilt. Why would the kilt not be described as tartan if all these other items are described as tartan, unless the kilt were not tartan? Just saying...

I also note the long hair tied back.
Might it be that the kilt was a tweed (as suggested earlier). When patterned fabric needs repairs, they show pretty readily.

If I was wearing something out in the bracken and it might be (probably WAS) my only one, I'd prefer it to be easily repaired (or at least, to hide the repairs made).

The tartan items might be their 'finery' with the real work-horse made in a more plain material.

I don't have a ton of historical expertise in Highland wear, but it makes sense to me.ith:

BTW: This is a fascinating discussion, thanks again for posting this