Quote Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome View Post
So, in this context, the term "Scottish kilt" would refer to the style of the garment, not the country of origin per se. One could make a kilt just like the ones pictured above in Scotland, England, France, America, Brazil, Australia, or the Moon and it would be a "Scottish kilt" (as opposed to any of the other above examples).

However, I do think some kind of labeling scheme would go a long way towards informing the consumer. A simple "Made in Scotland" label would be easy to apply and show pride in Scottish craftsmanship. And if the kilt is not made in Scotland, just put in a label that tells where it is made. My own kilts have a tag that says "Crafted with pride in the USA." My labels also state "Made from 100% Scottish wool." So right there one has the information: where the cloth was woven; where the kilt was made.
I find I agree with Matt's general premise. As a consumer (rather than a kilt maker) I appreciate knowing as much as possible about the garment that I am purchasing. So if I want a $69 wonder (you wonder how they possibly made it for that little) kilt that I can spill beer on and not cry I don't really care where it came from or who made it (and thats a good thing). If I want a $600 formal kilt I want to know that I am getting my monies worth, so kilt maker and origin of material is important to me