X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
13th January 11, 05:18 AM
#23
 Originally Posted by BoldHighlander
I fear we may never know for certain. Well, as I said earlier, the historians will no doubt continue to debate them.
I'm all for healthy debate, I just think it let's history down when people say things as fact, (in this case regarding Derricke) when the evidence is scarce, or even pointing the other way.
When it comes to kilts, personally, as a Scotsman, I don't really think of myself wearing much further back than what the Victorians wore, if we are talking about the pleated, presssed and stitched garment. I don't really look back into the hoary mists of time often, but when I do I find an awfy' lot o' breeks.
I know from other forums that the topic of the history of Irish kilts is a hot one, especially in the US. Factually, we know that the kilt was promoted for use by members of the Gaelic League from 1900 onwards. That should be enough justification for anyone of Irish blood who wants to wear one to go and happily put one on, I would have thought. You can find Patrick Pearse/Pádraig Pearse's thoughts on the matter online easy enough.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Stilletto_Rebel in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 27
Last Post: 10th January 10, 09:02 AM
-
By CDNSushi in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 13
Last Post: 8th January 10, 08:56 PM
-
By Jimmy in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 30
Last Post: 2nd October 09, 08:19 AM
-
By michael steinrok in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 28
Last Post: 5th January 06, 11:19 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks