-
22nd October 07, 04:58 AM
#1
Septs and Clans - a Little Flexible
Sir Crispin Agnew of Lochnaw, Baronet, QC, Rothesay Herald of Arms and Chief of Clan Agnew, also makes mention of Clan ‘septs’ in his article ‘Clans, Families & Septs’;
“It should also be said that the various Sept lists, which are published in the various Clans and Tartan books, have no official authority. They merely represent some person's, (usually in the Victorian eras) views of which name groups were in a particular clan's territory. Thus we find members of a clan described, as being persons owing allegiance to their chief "be pretence of blud or place of thare duelling". In addition to blood members of the clan, certain families have a tradition (even if the tradition can with the aid of modern records be shown to be wrong) descent from a particular clan chief. They are, of course, still recognised as being members of the clan.
Historically, the concept of "clan territory" also gives rise to difficulty, particularly as certain names or Septs claim allegiance to a particular chief, because they come from his territory. The extent of the territory of any particular chief varied from time to time depending on the waxing and waning of his power. Thus a particular name living on the boundaries of a clan's territory would find that while the chiefs power was on the up they would owe him allegiance but - if his power declined retrospectively at some arbitrary' date which the compiler of the list has selected. Often the names are Scotland-wide and so it is difficult to say that particular name belongs to a particular clan. Often surnames are shown as potentially being members of a number of clans, and this is because a number of that name has been found in each different clan's territory. Generally speaking, if a person has a particular sept name which can he attributed to a number of clans, either they should determine from what part of Scotland their family originally came and owe allegiance to the clan of that area or, alternatively, if they do not know where they came from, they should perhaps owe allegiance to the clan to which their family had traditionally owed allegiance. Alternatively, they may offer their allegiance to any of the particular named clans in the hope that the chief will accept them as a member of his clan. Equally, as has already been said, with the variations from time to time of particular chiefly territories, it can be said that at one particular era some names were members of or owed allegiance to a particular chief while a century later their allegiance may well have been owed elsewhere.
In summary, therefore, the right to belong to a clan or family, which are the same thing, is a matter for the determination of the chief who is entitled to accept or reject persons who offer him their allegiance.”
-
-
22nd October 07, 01:56 PM
#2
what is the "victorian era"?
Gillmore of Clan Morrison
"Long Live the Long Shirts!"- Ryan Ross
-
-
22nd October 07, 02:27 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by Nick the DSM
what is the "victorian era"?
The period from1837 to 1901 as far as fashion history is concerned.
-
-
22nd October 07, 02:28 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by Nick the DSM
what is the "victorian era"?
1837 - 1901 the reign of Queen Victoria. Followed by the Edwardian period1901 - 1910.
-
-
22nd October 07, 02:28 PM
#5
 Originally Posted by Nick the DSM
what is the "victorian era"?
Google is your friend: http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...=victorian+era
Best regards,
Jake
[B]Less talk, more monkey![/B]
-
-
21st October 07, 10:13 AM
#6
Marcus very interesting information on Heraldry.
By the way,
-
-
23rd October 07, 08:45 AM
#7
Speaking of a really good feeling, I've heard a
kilt myth that scottish men don't wear anything
under their kilts.
Other kilt myths I've heard:
You can't make a kilt out of asymmetric plaid fabric.
You can't hem a kilt.
Kilts must have 3 buckles.
Kilts must be wool.
Kilts must be tartan.
Kilts must be X yards of fabric.
Kilts are not warm in winter.
You can't make a kilt out of a table cloth.
-
-
23rd October 07, 12:27 PM
#8
If I could jump back a bit on this thread, I was looking at the statues depicted representing Wallace. I wonder if they really ARE wearing kilts. The Gibson-looking one certainly seems to me more like he's wearing a "leine" under his armor, and over that a belted plaid.
-
-
19th December 07, 08:15 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by Galician
If I could jump back a bit on this thread, I was looking at the statues depicted representing Wallace. I wonder if they really ARE wearing kilts. The Gibson-looking one certainly seems to me more like he's wearing a "leine" under his armor, and over that a belted plaid. 
Interestingly enough, the statue of Wallace in front of the Edinburgh Castle has him in period-appropriate clothing.
-
-
17th December 07, 05:07 PM
#10
The area I live in has some of the worst schools in the nation (and some of the highest dollar per student averages, so lack of money is not the cause). There are places with excellent under-paid, under-valued teachers. Then there is Arizona...
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks