-
5th September 05, 08:51 PM
#1
A Viking Kilt!
On another thread there was some mention of a Viking Kilt, whilst I have never encountered any suggestion that they wore such a garment, there is good evidence that some would wear a long-knee length tunic, without trousers.
To support this, some years ago in the Haithabu musem [Northern Germany-on the Baltic Coast], one of the clothing models wore a knee length belted tunic rather than trousers.
There again such a tunic was reasonably common male wear in Europe at that time.
So my guess, and it can only be a guess is that our ancestors wore the tunic-which in time evolved into the long shirt, and their cloak or wrap for bad weather in turn evolved into first the belted plaid and then the kilt as we know it today.
James
-
-
6th September 05, 02:44 AM
#2
(Please, Lord, spare us this yet again...)
I'm sorry, I was praying.
This is a very interesting thread that argues the origins of the kilt as Celtic:
http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=12845
I believe it eventually makes very clear the kilt is a Scottish garment.
-
-
6th September 05, 03:04 AM
#3
My references make it clear that the vikings wore the tunic, as you stated, with trousers. They seem to have preferred trousers, sissies, adapting several comtemporary Eurasian styles. This, I surmise, evolved into ABBA.
-
-
6th September 05, 03:35 AM
#4
Originally Posted by James
On another thread there was some mention of a Viking Kilt, whilst I have never encountered any suggestion that they wore such a garment, there is good evidence that some would wear a long-knee length tunic, without trousers.
To support this, some years ago in the Haithabu musem [Northern Germany-on the Baltic Coast], one of the clothing models wore a knee length belted tunic rather than trousers.
There again such a tunic was reasonably common male wear in Europe at that time.
So my guess, and it can only be a guess is that our ancestors wore the tunic-which in time evolved into the long shirt, and their cloak or wrap for bad weather in turn evolved into first the belted plaid and then the kilt as we know it today.
James
James , yes you are correct, tunics though were anything from waist to knees.
For the bare legged idea look at the bayeaux tapestry, I think there is at least one male who is working bare legged.Beside which this is the nearest thing to a photo of the time we're going to get, and yes there is reference to some individual ( magnus barefoot ) in the viking sagas, but he was wearing a pleated coat.
Trousers ,yes, but there also was this form of legwear that resembled hose and tied up onto a belt that was then covered by a tunic.
But why has the cloak then only in scotland managed to transform into a great kilt when the vikings manged to travel to some far off lands.
Last edited by Ranald; 6th September 05 at 01:52 PM.
-
-
6th September 05, 05:52 AM
#5
I don't know, several of the Viking raders in the Capitol One comercials look like they're wearing a kilt like garmet. Surely a credit card company wouldn't portray history inaccurately.
Adam
-
-
6th September 05, 01:26 PM
#6
Dig it !
Find me from a dig or a bog a warrior in a kilt and I may believe it.
As I said all manner of people would love to find evidence to support that vikings wore kilts ( I would too for obvious reasons) but the kirtle as it's correctly called looks skirt like and the more fabric you wore/had the better off you abviously was.This does not prove vikings wore kilts.
As I also said recently is there a picture of a kilt wearer in the bayeaux tapestry which shows the battle of Hastings (which is in fact saxons verses normans) NO.
-
-
6th September 05, 01:32 PM
#7
Originally Posted by arrogcow
I don't know, several of the Viking raders in the Capitol One comercials look like they're wearing a kilt like garmet. Surely a credit card company wouldn't portray history inaccurately.
Adam
They are Pillagers. And they wear a bit of everything, from Greco Roman, to Hunnish, to Norse and Celtic.
And now, sadly, most are out of work.
-
-
6th September 05, 01:54 PM
#8
Originally Posted by arrogcow
I don't know, several of the Viking raders in the Capitol One comercials look like they're wearing a kilt like garmet. Surely a credit card company wouldn't portray history inaccurately.
Adam
I take this to be tongue in cheek..Yes.
What would a credit card company know anyhow.
-
-
6th September 05, 01:57 PM
#9
Originally Posted by Ranald
I take this to be tongue in cheek..Yes.
What would a credit card company know anyhow.
Tongue in cheek for sure. Those Capital One commercials were pretty funny. Better than the ones in the call center.
-
-
6th September 05, 02:01 PM
#10
Peopl e ask me if I am one of the Pillagers on tv.
Why? :-|
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks