-
12th November 05, 06:43 AM
#1
Kilt jacket for $25
Now that I have your attention with the subject line, here is a photo of a Harris Tweed sportscoat I had cut down to a kilt jacket. The alteration shop just charged me $25 for the work. I got the jacket for free -- it was a thrift store friend of a friend of mine who thought I would like it. I doubt she paid more than $5 for it.
http://blog.albanach.org/2005/11/do-...lt-jacket.html
Aye,
Matt
-
-
12th November 05, 07:11 AM
#2
Thats a great look.When altering a jacket to wear with a kilt,where on the kilt should the bottom come to?Or is this a matter of personal preferance?
-
-
12th November 05, 07:58 AM
#3
OK...you got my attention
Matt,
Great looking jacket. We Scots are always looking for a good deal.
-
-
12th November 05, 09:55 AM
#4
Many people wonder about adding on features typical in standard "kilt jackets" such as guantlet cuffs, epaulettes, etc. I wasn't worried about these. I have them on my formal jacket, and they are fine, but this coat was for casual wear.
I absolutely agree with you there, but what about the front cut-away? I've always thought that to be an integral part of any kilt jacket's design.
Edit: Make that "traditional / semi-traditional-kilt jacket, i.e. worn with a sporran.
Last edited by Iolaus; 12th November 05 at 12:05 PM.
-
-
12th November 05, 11:58 AM
#5
I agree with Iolaus - it needs a cutaway. Look how it falls over top of your sporran.
Otherwise, it's money well spent, indeed. I did something similar a couple years ago. I had a seamstress turn a pair of Dockers into golf knickers. The cuffs were frayed, anyway, and those knickers are WAY overpriced.
Virtus Ad Aethera Tendit
-
-
12th November 05, 01:32 PM
#6
It could use a cutaway, you are right. I just neglected to mention that to the seamstress. When I don't have the jacket buttoned, it's not that much of an issue, so I'll probably just leave it as is.
M
-
-
12th November 05, 01:40 PM
#7
I'll probably just leave it as is.
Might as well. Spending $25.00 for a kilt jacket as opposed to well over $200.00 for some I've seen online is quite a deal considering the few people who will notice the difference.
-
-
12th November 05, 03:10 PM
#8
Hi Matt,
Was shortening of the overall length the only change made to the jacket?
At least one member of X-Marks had a jacket cut down and reported that the result looked odd because the lapels looked overly long. The lapels on your jacket look fine. Were the lapels altered?
-
-
12th November 05, 03:31 PM
#9
When I first read the subject line, I was hoping that Matt was starting to sell jackets for $25.00.
Yet it is a great reminder for all of us to keep an eye out for some fantastic bargains, at many unexpected places. (Even some expected places).
Glen McGuire
A Life Lived in Fear, Is a Life Half Lived.
-
-
12th November 05, 03:49 PM
#10
Originally Posted by GMan
When I first read the subject line, I was hoping that Matt was starting to sell jackets for $25.00.
Yet it is a great reminder for all of us to keep an eye out for some fantastic bargains, at many unexpected places. (Even some expected places).
Too right Glen! I did a blog on that subject today.
With apologies to Matt for showing off my jacket in his thread ...
http://macbitseach.blogspot.com/
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks