X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
22nd March 06, 02:19 AM
#1
Interesting Kilt belt
Thought this was interesting...but is it me or does it look like it would shred a good kilt in a heartbeat?
http://cgi.ebay.com/WW1-CEF-Canadian...QQcmdZViewItem
John
-
-
22nd March 06, 03:38 AM
#2
love to see what that woudl do to the metal detector/security gate at the airport... that thing must weigh a TON!!!
ITS A KILT, G** D*** IT!
WARNING: I RUN WITH SCISSORS
“I asked Mom if I was a gifted child… she said they certainly wouldn’t have paid for me."
-
-
22nd March 06, 04:22 AM
#3
belt...
First time I've ever seen a Canadian version...The ANZACS (Australia New Zealand Army Corps) also followed this tradition of collecting cap badges, shoulder titles and "collar dogs" and puting them on waist belts. There's a picture of a "Digger" at Gallipoli wearing one in Laffin and Chappell's "The Australian Army at War 1899-1975".
Cheers, 
Todd
-
-
22nd March 06, 05:50 AM
#4
Not something that would have been worn in uniform in Canada. Although it is possible that bands may have done this between the Wars. Definately tear the snot out of a good kilt, unless pins/lugs get covered with another piece of leather.
-
-
22nd March 06, 06:12 AM
#5
"hate belt"...
I knew this type of belt had a name: a "hate belt":
http://www.diggerhistory.info/pages-...ble_belts2.htm
Scroll down, and you'll see some Aussie examples.
Basically it was a way for soldiers to display their collections of allied and enemy insignia -- very unofficial, of course.
Here are a few more examples:
http://www.trenchart.org/HateBelt.htm
http://www.militaryantiquesmuseum.co...searchfor=1186
Cheers, 
Todd
-
-
22nd March 06, 10:36 AM
#6
I could only think that that belt is purely decorative and not to actually be worn.
-
-
22nd March 06, 11:04 AM
#7
...and if this type of belt ever was worn, it would be over the tunic, not the kilt.
-
-
22nd March 06, 12:03 PM
#8
"hate belt"
 Originally Posted by Colin
I could only think that that belt is purely decorative and not to actually be worn.
The Aussies did, Colin. See my first post about the ANZAC wearing one at Gallipoli -- but in general, I agree with you, they were more of a "collector's item" than any practical purpose in the field.
T.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks