-
7th October 07, 07:01 PM
#1
Kilt length has already won? Never gone?
My fashion sense takes a while to catch up.
My summer shorts for many years have been…short.
Five-inch rise common. Think Crocodile Hunter.
Cargo pockets yes, but the small ones up high on the thigh front.
Late this summer three things happened to me:
I noticed that everyone seemed to be wearing knee length cargo shorts except me.
I asked my family (wife, adult children) and friends if my shorts were “out of style”. YES!
I acquired my first kilt (an AK). Length 24 inches. Perfect for my six-foot height and knee height for the kilt to lay just at the top of my knees.
Surrendering to current common fashion (what an odd comment for a kilt wearer to make!) and taking advantage of end of season discounts, I purchased knee length cargo shorts.
They are the same length as a kilt! And look best that way.
And look “off” if worn below the knee or too far above.
And wide-legged enough to lay away form the skin – a kilt echo?
I think back to the original “Bermuda Shorts” and British military shorts.
Knee length. Commonly worn with hose.
Have we come full circle? Kilts to Western Desert/Tropical Shorts to to Bermuda Shorts to today’s cargo shorts.
Swim Trunks went from long to short and back to knee length surf shorts.
Cycling shorts? Just above the knee. Ok maybe higher than that.
I seem to recall that Utilkilts were first designed as modified cargo shorts.
So Tartan and pleats and swing (don’t say swish*) aside for the moment, bifurcation is the only “obstacle” to wider kilt wear.
(*And maybe call them front panels rather than apron?)
Really not such a big final step one would think. Or is it?
Your thoughts? Good stuff for kilt explanation/advocacy/conversion persuasion conversations?
I suppose it can be thrown back. WHY were shorts used rather than kilts issued in the desert? Why were there no “Bermuda Kilts”?
Is the garment style association too firmly set as female unless Tartan and Scottish?
[FONT="Georgia"][B][I]-- Larry B.[/I][/B][/FONT]
-
-
7th October 07, 08:03 PM
#2
Hi Larry, and welcome to X-Marks. Some still wear the shorter Ocean Pacific ("OP" or "Old People" ) shorts if they can find them.
What are you doing spending your kilt money on those, anyway?
-
-
7th October 07, 08:25 PM
#3
Kilt Length Has Already Won
Thanks walkerk,
"...What are you doing spending your kilt money on those, anyway?"
True. True.
My love affair with kilts was new and confused and tentative and hesitant.
I still have some shy-guy newbie self-consciousness.
I vow to strive and overcome. (Sounds like a Motto.)
[FONT="Georgia"][B][I]-- Larry B.[/I][/B][/FONT]
-
-
9th October 07, 12:00 PM
#4
Welcome to XMTS, Larry.
I'm with you on the shorts. I'm so out of style it hurts. I figure if I'm going to wear shorts (and I wear them a lot), they're going to be short. I can't get into the flood pants thing. Bathing suits? Same thing. I don't like the feel of long, wet, baggy bathing suits. I prefer my cycling shorts shorter as well, but I can't always find them that way. BTW, I like cargo pockets too.
"Touch not the cat bot a glove."
-
-
9th October 07, 12:23 PM
#5
-
-
9th October 07, 02:37 PM
#6
Ha, that'll fix the kids: don't like dad in his shorts? Here's my kilt: how do you like me now?
How do they like you now?
-
Similar Threads
-
By Clan Sutherland in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 24
Last Post: 13th August 07, 11:54 AM
-
By saecoman99 in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 1
Last Post: 6th March 07, 05:44 AM
-
By Mike1 in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 20
Last Post: 5th August 06, 06:08 PM
-
By davedove in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 7
Last Post: 23rd September 05, 04:45 PM
-
By Woodsheal in forum Traditional Kilt Wear
Replies: 9
Last Post: 5th April 05, 05:27 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks