-
17th January 11, 05:39 PM
#1
19th century Scotch found in Antarctica
A mate showed me this article today:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41122315...cience-science
The second to last sentence nearly brought me to tears
elim
-
-
17th January 11, 09:38 PM
#2
I saw an article some time ago that they had found this stash, and that it had to remain onsite for historic preservation reasons. Seems a shame, I could have stored a bottle or two here for them I wonder who is going to be privaleged enough to do the tasting during the testing. I'd love to be in on that gig.
His Exalted Highness Duke Standard the Pertinacious of Chalmondley by St Peasoup
Member Order of the Dandelion
Per Electum - Non consanguinitam
-
-
17th January 11, 10:55 PM
#3
wow! As a "tester" of 30 year old scotch a few weeks back, I feel comfortable stepping up to the plate to donate my expertise to the test!
-
-
18th January 11, 03:57 AM
#4
Guinness and Whisky, the Polar explorers were well stocked up. It's always been my dream to go to the Antartic, maybe one day.
-
-
18th January 11, 06:40 AM
#5
Remember guys, the age of the whisky relates to its years in the cask BEFORE bottling, once it is in the bottle generally its flavor can only go downhill due to cork rot, evaporation through the cork, any possible damage done by prolonged exposure to extreme cold (not something normally tested on most whiskies), etc... so no matter how many years it has spent "on ice" in Antarctica it should not taste any better now than it did when bottled, and if anything maybe worse. If I remember Mackinlays was a relatively common blended whisky that just happened to be the preferred brand of Shackleton readily available at the time of the expedition.
Most of the value of these bottles is in historic terms, much like scooping a plate from the Titanic wreckage off the floor of the ocean---it is no better a plate than any other, it has just been though a historic event and lived to "tell its tale". Even for those who get to taste or scientifically evaluate it I would not be surprised if they were disappointed with its "quality" and flavor being not stellar compared to today's norms.
Although a bottle of it would be an exceptional conversation piece regardless of the taste of the whisky.
j
-
-
18th January 11, 06:50 AM
#6
"...whisky will be studied and tasted in a lab for six weeks..." How do I apply for this part of the job?
"Two things are infinite- the universe, and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." Albert Einstein.
-
-
18th January 11, 07:17 AM
#7
Originally Posted by ForresterModern
Remember guys, the age of the whisky relates to its years in the cask BEFORE bottling, once it is in the bottle generally its flavor can only go downhill due to cork rot, evaporation through the cork, any possible damage done by prolonged exposure to extreme cold (not something normally tested on most whiskies), etc... so no matter how many years it has spent "on ice" in Antarctica it should not taste any better now than it did when bottled, and if anything maybe worse. If I remember Mackinlays was a relatively common blended whisky that just happened to be the preferred brand of Shackleton readily available at the time of the expedition.
Quite correct. It was originally (1875-ish) being sold as a vatted whisky, which nowadays would mean that at least it was all malt. Now, however, it's explicitly marketed as a blended whisky.
"It's all the same to me, war or peace,
I'm killed in the war or hung during peace."
-
-
18th January 11, 11:19 PM
#8
Originally Posted by ForresterModern
Remember guys, the age of the whisky relates to its years in the cask BEFORE bottling, once it is in the bottle generally its flavor can only go downhill due to cork rot, evaporation through the cork, any possible damage done by prolonged exposure to extreme cold (not something normally tested on most whiskies), etc... so no matter how many years it has spent "on ice" in Antarctica it should not taste any better now than it did when bottled, and if anything maybe worse. If I remember Mackinlays was a relatively common blended whisky that just happened to be the preferred brand of Shackleton readily available at the time of the expedition.
Most of the value of these bottles is in historic terms, much like scooping a plate from the Titanic wreckage off the floor of the ocean---it is no better a plate than any other, it has just been though a historic event and lived to "tell its tale". Even for those who get to taste or scientifically evaluate it I would not be surprised if they were disappointed with its "quality" and flavor being not stellar compared to today's norms.
Although a bottle of it would be an exceptional conversation piece regardless of the taste of the whisky.
j
Yeah, yeah, we know the spiel. Party pooper
Though I wholeheartedly agree with your last statement!
elim
-
-
20th January 11, 11:46 AM
#9
Elim - maybe Marius can get us a bottle for Scotch tasting at Trinity Hall...
-
Similar Threads
-
By DirtDiver_76 in forum Kilt Board Newbie
Replies: 23
Last Post: 16th June 10, 10:38 AM
-
By Twa_Corbies in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 27
Last Post: 19th March 09, 09:22 AM
-
By RockyR in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 32
Last Post: 1st February 09, 03:14 PM
-
By Rogerson785 in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 9
Last Post: 31st January 08, 08:59 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks