-
-
-
Personally I would go with the tartan hose. I think the red/white diced are a little loud and may upstage the bride some.
proud U.S. Navy vet
Creag ab Sgairbh
-
-
Not this bride...!
"A true gentleman knows how to play the bagpipes but doesn't!"
Member of Clan Macpherson Association
-
-
If you have other kilts you'd like to wear a pair of dress hose with, red and white or red and black hose would be the more economical solution.
Sailortats is right that the tartan hose are a bit more understated, but if the bride is "going big" that's not really an issue ![Laughing](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
As for the shoes, they're okay, but if it's a formal (evening) do you might want something without the monk strap- which is a bit more casual than laces.
http://www.zappos.com/florsheim-king...patent-leather
or if you did want a touch of brogueing, perhaps the below
http://www.zappos.com/florsheim-mill...fcTest=fcl%3A0
Simple and shiny is the way to go (unless you want to go all out and get buckle brogues / mary janes for evening dress).
ith:
-
-
Hey Artificer, thanks for the detailed reply.
I think the bride will be "very big" and so will be the groom. Not kilted but in morning suit and top hat.
It will be a wedding in Bavaria with about 200 guests, two orchestras, a choir singing, a big band for the party and so on...so I will just be a bit of colour.
Yes, I guess the diced hose would be a little more in use but I also like the argylls very much, so...
I do have some formal lace-ups, also in patent leather but it will be a morning wedding so I wanted to be a little less formal.
I could change for evening. A real formal dress kilt shoe maybe would be too much I guess, though I'll need some one day...
Thanks, Tom
"A true gentleman knows how to play the bagpipes but doesn't!"
Member of Clan Macpherson Association
-
-
Be carefull, it is very easy to turn Kilt day "dress" (morning suit equivalent)attire into a costume. Diced, or argyll hose are not necessarilly required, nor are shoes any fancier than well polished black lace up shoes, or if you really insist, a pair of ghillie brogues.
Just saying.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
-
Thanks Jock Scot,
as I read dress kilt hose are an essential part of morning dress highland attire (Tartans and Highland Dress by MacKinnon f.g.). He also recommends buckle dress shoes for morning dress which I find a bit too much but I am not a big friend of ghillie brogue because they are too folkloristic to me so the brogued monks seemed to be a more moderate alternative...but that is, as we often read, a question of personal preference...
What kind of hose would you wear for such an occasion?
Tom
Last edited by Pipersson; 26th May 13 at 04:16 AM.
"A true gentleman knows how to play the bagpipes but doesn't!"
Member of Clan Macpherson Association
-
-
If you like the argyle hose, then there ya have it. Althoufh, I would go with a plain and simple black shoe and put a nice shine on them.
-
-
Given your choice of two, I'd be inclined to go with he tartan, a little more subdued for the formal occasion. Though personally, I'd probably go with plain hose, maybe a subdued Lovatt green? Or Black with the black shoes? Whatever you feel more comfortable with.
Regards, Sav.
"The Sun Never Sets on X-Marks!"
-
-
26th May 13, 06:20 AM
#10
I may have missed this, but what time will the wedding occur?
Although there may be some differences worldwide, the conventions surrounding evening dress vs. less formal day attire might be a helpful guide.
Last edited by davidlpope; 26th May 13 at 06:21 AM.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks