X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
7th March 22, 05:38 PM
#1
the Scotch Whiskey Assoc.
I don't always agree with Ralfy, but I think he nailed it with this one:
ralfy review 916 Extras - Macaloney Versus S.W.A. - YouTube
Thoughts?
Please be polite....
"Good judgement comes from experience, and experience
well, that comes from poor judgement."
A. A. Milne
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Liam For This Useful Post:
-
8th March 22, 03:54 AM
#2
Some of his "legal" analysis and terminology is a bit off-kilter - but hey ho.
Looking at other resources on this the main crux of this is about the use of Caledonian rather than the name Macalony - which makes sense in the context of protected designations of origin and geographical indications - which BTW are remain in force post Brexit - but new ones need separate registrations in the UK and EU.
For my money, the use of Caledonia is a bit of a try on by Macalony and clearly intended to invoke a sense of "Scottishness". I'd certainly be advising them that the best course of action would be drop this - esp. if they have an eye on export sales. That said, I do like ralfy's suggestion of some tongue in cheek reference to the SAWs actions - we did something similar when a client of mine was on the receiving end of a threats action from Café de Paris...
Last edited by Tomo; 9th March 22 at 12:26 AM.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks