Quote Originally Posted by shane the piper View Post
1.I think its wrong because a kilt/tartan is a sign of heritage not something thats worn to be seen as rebelious or different.

2.I think its great because it popularizes the kilt.

3.Its good but I feel there should be a line of sorts drawn to bring respect to the kilt and its meaning.

4.I dont care.

5. I think its wrong because they are wearing the kilt for the wrong reason.
With the exception of #4 (because I do care) I think all can apply. Lets face it even wearing the most traditional kilt is a bit rebellious if it is worn outside Scotland as regular attire. You may be honouring your heritage but you are still rebelling against the norms of society and what it thinks men should wear. However, I don't think that is the type of rebelling you are talking about and I do have a problem with that because I do feel it doesn't pay due respect to the heritage.

In fact, I must admit this thread started me thinking and I believe I understand why I don't like many of the garments you are referring to ... it strikes me that they are not respectful, in my opinion, of the kilt's heritage and what it stands for. I always knew I didn't like many of these garments before (and that I don't consider them kilts) but I had not actually realised why it bothered me until now.

Many of the contemporary and casual kilts are great and I think it is wonderful if non-Scots wear kilts. However, the kilt a Scottish garment (and almost universally accepted by society as such) and I think if one chooses to wear a kilt the garment and the wearer should reflect the kilts heritage.

So I guess I am closest to #3. Most important I want to thank you for making me feel more comfortable about being what some members would consider a kilt snob.