De-Anglicisation of Names

[kevinkinney]

Thank you for the info.

Theres a slight correction,

A review of our family chart shows the first recorded instance of "Kinney" as "Henry Kinne", with no prefix. This was while our ancestor was still in England.

Cheers,

Kevin.

[Gaisgeil]

How about Boyd?
It's Buidhe, correct? I think it means fair haired or in reference to the island of Bute. Any further insight?

[slohairt]

How about Boyd?
It's Buidhe, correct? I think it means fair haired or in reference to the island of Bute. Any further insight?

Dia Dhuit, A Ghaisgeil,

Buidhe (pronounced BWEE) is the Gaelic word for yellow, so in that context, I suppose it could mean fair-haired. However, it is almost always Anglicised as Bowie. Boyd comes from Bòid (pronounced BOE-ID) and is topographical in origin, referring to the Isle of Bute.

[MacHenderson]

On the first page, Bradley asked about the name Henderson, or MacEunrig. Me and my dad have been arguing for a long time how its pronounced though. I think its pronouced like the alternative, MacKendrick. He thinks its pronounced Mac-YOOn-rig. Which is correct? Both? or neither?

Also, can you de-anglicise first names? I'm pretty sure my name, Woodrow, is an Anglo name. But that'd be cool if it could be de-anglicised.

[slohairt]

On the first page, Bradley asked about the name Henderson, or MacEunrig. Me and my dad have been arguing for a long time how its pronounced though. I think its pronouced like the alternative, MacKendrick. He thinks its pronounced Mac-YOOn-rig. Which is correct? Both? or neither?

Also, can you de-anglicise first names? I'm pretty sure my name, Woodrow, is an Anglo name. But that'd be cool if it could be de-anglicised.

Mac Eanruig meaning son of Henry, is pronounced MAC EN-RICK. The "d" in the Anglicisation of MacKendrick is just a phonetic aid. (i.e. Rodgers, Thompson, etc.)

As for first names, I think what you're asking for are Gaelic versions of other names. De-anglicisation of a first name would only apply to names like Shaun, which is an Anglicisation of Seán, or Donald, which is an Anglicisation of Domhnall.

Woodrow is Anglo-Saxon and originates from Woodruff, the plant. The Gaelic name for the plant is Lus a' Caitheamh (LUS A KA-yEV).

[slohairt]

MacHenderson has brought up an interesting related topic: Gaelic personal names.

Here is a sample list for your enjoyment.

Aindréas (m.) (IRISH) "Andrew"
Bhàltair (m.) (SCOTTISH) "Walter"
Catreeney (f.) (MANX) "Catherine"
Dainéal (m.) (IRISH) "Daniel"
Eumann (m.) (SCOTTISH) "Edmond"
Fynngal (m.) (MANX) "fair foreigner" (i.e. a Norwegian)
Gráinne (f.) (IRISH) "beloved(?)"
Ìosag (m.) (SCOTTISH) "Isaac"
Jamys (m.) (MANX) "James"
Lorcán (m.) (IRISH) "little fierce one"
Màiri (f.) (SCOTTISH) "Mary"
Niglas (m.) (MANX) "Nicholas"
Oisín (m.) (IRISH) "little deer"
Pàdair (m.) (SCOTTISH) "Peter"
Reerey (m.) (MANX) "possession holder(?)"
Séarlas (m.) (IRISH) "Charles"
Tòireusa (f.) (SCOTTISH) "Theresa"
Uaggin (m.) (MANX) "little horseman(?)"

[davedove]

On the first page, Bradley asked about the name Henderson, or MacEunrig. Me and my dad have been arguing for a long time how its pronounced though. I think its pronouced like the alternative, MacKendrick. He thinks its pronounced Mac-YOOn-rig. Which is correct? Both? or neither?

Also, can you de-anglicise first names? I'm pretty sure my name, Woodrow, is an Anglo name. But that'd be cool if it could be de-anglicised.

Only an individual's family can really say how a name is pronounced. We've talked a lot about alternate spellings here, but there are also alternate pronunciations of names. These could result from many things, like regional dialects or even an ancestor who had a speech impediment.

A real good example is Smith and Smythe.

Isn't language interesting?

[Wompet]

Davedove's got a point - I know a family, half of whom are "E-la-son" and the other half are "E-li-a-son." And my Irish-American relatives are both "Dawn-ell" and "Don-Nul."

Slohairt, thanks for resurrecting this thread. I have three questions for you:
First, I had a roommate back in college whose Irish surname had been Anglicized to "Cummiskey," he thought the original had been pronounced "Mac-Cum-moch." Any guesses?

Second, what would the Gaelicisation of the English surname Sackett be? The original may have been occupational, as we are all supposedly descended from Andrew le Sacre, but the Sacketts are geographically centered around one location (no wool-sackers in the rest of England?).

Third, what is the feminine of Lorcán? (Given the family history of women most of my male ancestors have married, I should be on the lookout for her. )

[slohairt]

Davedove's got a point - I know a family, half of whom are "E-la-son" and the other half are "E-li-a-son." And my Irish-American relatives are both "Dawn-ell" and "Don-Nul."

Slohairt, thanks for resurrecting this thread. I have three questions for you:
First, I had a roommate back in college whose Irish surname had been Anglicized to "Cummiskey," he thought the original had been pronounced "Mac-Cum-moch." Any guesses?

Second, what would the Gaelicisation of the English surname Sackett be? The original may have been occupational, as we are all supposedly descended from Andrew le Sacre, but the Sacketts are geographically centered around one location (no wool-sackers in the rest of England?).

Third, what is the feminine of Lorcán? (Given the family history of women most of my male ancestors have married, I should be on the lookout for her. )

SACKETT: You asked me that back in Post #55!

CUMMISKEY: Actually, Cummiskey is closer to the original pronunciation. It is anglicised from Mac Cumascaigh (pronounced MAC KUM-ASK-EE) which means son of Cumascach, a personal name meaning vigorous.

LORCÁN: To the best of knowledge, there is no feminine form of Lorcán. Gaelic doesn't have a lot of feminine versions of indigenous male names. I suppose you could try Lorcána or Lorcáinín based on recognised patterns in Irish naming. [i.e. Pádraig (m) = Pádraigín (f); Gearóid (m) = Gearóidín (f)]

[slohairt]

Only an individual's family can really say how a name is pronounced. We've talked a lot about alternate spellings here, but there are also alternate pronunciations of names. These could result from many things, like regional dialects or even an ancestor who had a speech impediment.

A real good example is Smith and Smythe.

Isn't language interesting?

That is true to some extent. The pronunciation I am using is the written standard for Gaelic (whether Irish or Scottish).

Despite having dialects and other variances, one will discover that Gaelic does not have the divergence in sounds that English does. Nor does the spelling vary much. The greatest strength of the English language is its adaptability. Your example of Smith/Smythe, however, illustrates its greatest weakness: poor orthography.

The English language has undergone an immense amount of change over the past thousand years. Gaelic, relatively speaking, has not. It must also be remembered that Gaelic (or rather, Irish, as they were one and the same back then) is Europe's oldest literary language after Greek and Latin.