|
-
26th January 10, 07:52 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by cajunscot
Boudin Blanc is very similar to Haggis, the major difference being the seasonings and rice instead of oatmeal.
T.
Very true. I forget that NOLA boudin blanc is very different from French boudin blanc.
Jim
-
-
26th January 10, 08:26 PM
#2
I would have at least tried the haggis. Honestly, it doesn't sound all that appetizing, but hey, you never know if you don't try... As for the lack of kilts, I am sure this forum will still be around when they change their minds
-
-
26th January 10, 08:29 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by Drac
Very true. I forget that NOLA boudin blanc is very different from French boudin blanc.
Jim
Boudin isn't traditionally New Orleans though; it is Cajun. Most folks think New Orleans is Cajun, which isn't the case; it is Creole in culture. As my mother-in-law (who is half Cajun, half Creole) explains it, Cajun is rural, Creole is urban.
That being said, you'll find boudin in NOLA today, but the old Creole families wouldn't have known it.
T.
-
-
26th January 10, 09:49 PM
#4
Wow, are we to the point that not eating one item on the menu is insulting . I never knew that a burns supper was about haggis. I thought it was about the memory of the Man and his works. Were there no other "traditional" Scottish dishes on the menu? Are there not even Scots that don't like haggis. It seems that Kilts are very often worn to the suppers but since when are they mandated by ettiquette.
I grew up in the South with all manner of "Southern" food and I still refuse to eat organs. Is that an insult to the hertage of the south of by passing up on hurling from eating something i think is absolutly disgusting . It's not about having testicular fortitude, Manning up, or any other macho rubbish. If you like to try new things i applaud you. If you are content with your range of current dishes, I applaud you. Nothing insulting about stating beforehand that he won't be trying any. It's not a measure of my open mindedness, or my "maturity", it's my choice as an adult what I'll eat or not eat.
"The Highland dress is essentially a 'free' dress, -- that is to say, a man's taste and circumstances must alone be permitted to decide when and where and how he should wear it... I presume to dictate to no man what he shall eat or drink or wherewithal he shall be clothed." -- The Hon. Stuart Ruaidri Erskine, The Kilt & How to Wear It, 1901.
-
-
27th January 10, 05:37 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by Moski
Wow, are we to the point that not eating one item on the menu is insulting  . I never knew that a burns supper was about haggis. I thought it was about the memory of the Man and his works. Were there no other " traditional" Scottish dishes on the menu? Are there not even Scots that don't like haggis. It seems that Kilts are very often worn to the suppers but since when are they mandated by ettiquette.
I grew up in the South with all manner of "Southern" food and I still refuse to eat organs. Is that an insult to the hertage of the south of by passing up on hurling from eating something i think is absolutly disgusting  . It's not about having testicular fortitude, Manning up, or any other macho rubbish. If you like to try new things i applaud you. If you are content with your range of current dishes, I applaud you. Nothing insulting about stating beforehand that he won't be trying any. It's not a measure of my open mindedness, or my "maturity", it's my choice as an adult what I'll eat or not eat.
Of course, one of the works of RB recited at a Burns Supper is "The Address to a Haggis". 
T.
-
-
27th January 10, 08:15 AM
#6
 Originally Posted by Moski
Wow, are we to the point that not eating one item on the menu is insulting  .
Looked at from a different perspective, I think it was the attitude that was displayed by postings on various social networks, before the event, that offended some people. Was I offended? No. I think the guys involved-- like many professional sports figures-- showed a high degree of self-indulgent arrogance, that's all. I can't imagine, for one second, a member of this forum posting on a social networking site that they would be attending a Langston Hughes Dinner, but flat out weren't going to eat grits and okra. You might leave them on your plate, untouched, but I doubt you'd be rude enough to publicly complain about dinner, before it was served.
-
-
27th January 10, 05:12 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Looked at from a different perspective, I think it was the attitude that was displayed by postings on various social networks, before the event, that offended some people. Was I offended? No. I think the guys involved-- like many professional sports figures-- showed a high degree of self-indulgent arrogance, that's all. I can't imagine, for one second, a member of this forum posting on a social networking site that they would be attending a Langston Hughes Dinner, but flat out weren't going to eat grits and okra. You might leave them on your plate, untouched, but I doubt you'd be rude enough to publicly complain about dinner, before it was served.
Thank you...
-
-
28th January 10, 12:30 PM
#8
 Originally Posted by cajunscot
... As my mother-in-law (who is half Cajun, half Creole) explains it, Cajun is rural, Creole is urban. ...
Cheers Todd. I never new that. I always assumed they were two words descibing same thing. (And I've even been to New Orleans as well... tishk-tishk.)
-
Similar Threads
-
By Amoskeag in forum Highland Games and Celtic Event Discussion
Replies: 3
Last Post: 25th January 09, 06:27 PM
-
By jordanjm in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 2
Last Post: 26th March 07, 08:40 PM
-
By Tattoo Bradley in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 12
Last Post: 2nd July 06, 10:04 AM
-
By AckZel in forum General Celtic Music Talk
Replies: 16
Last Post: 9th March 06, 01:12 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks