-
14th February 10, 12:13 PM
#41
Your reasoning is your own. My cousin has recently done the same. I have no opinion about it either way. Now, after $40,000 USD spent in higher learning:
Mitochondria are passed directly from the mother, they stop on the male side. i.e. You won't pass yours on, and your father didn't pass his on. Scientifically it makes sense to carry on your maternal name. oh, I got this useless piece of information in the first $8,000.
-
-
14th February 10, 03:34 PM
#42
Native cultures, geneology is traced through the woman... anyone can be your father... but you know exactly who your mother is....
“Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.”
– Robert Louis Stevenson
-
-
14th February 10, 10:09 PM
#43
Add to the list of cultures that use matrilineal genealogy, traditionally, Jewishness is also traced maternally (according to Halakha - Jewish law).
It seems to me that you've been thinking about this for a very long time, and have considered it on and off, but now more seriously. Sounds like you won't really get it off your mind until you either DO IT, or come up with an argument compelling enough to get it out of your head forever. Somehow I don't think the latter is your case, based on what you've told us. Given also that your own mother is very receptive to the idea, I'd say go for it.
Hey. Worst case scenario, you could always change it back if you don't like it. Really throw people for a loop!
Good luck with your new name, Mr. Kilpatrick.
-
-
15th February 10, 03:15 PM
#44
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom -- for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
-
-
15th February 10, 03:27 PM
#45
Sounds like a great idea for all the right reasons. Was it Shakespeare who said, "to thine own self be true"?
"You'll find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." -Obi Wan Kenobi
-
-
16th February 10, 06:47 AM
#46
I changed my last name at the age of 18 to that of my step-father. Today, almost 20 years later I am close with both my father and my step-father. There is no issues as my father understands my reasons.
Go for it!
-
-
16th February 10, 08:43 AM
#47
 Originally Posted by dutchy kilted
Was it Shakespeare who said, "to thine own self be true"?
It was ... although for better or worse he put those words (along with the equally well-known "Neither a borrower nor a lender be") into the mouth of a pompous and relatively foolish character: Polonius, in Hamlet.
Last edited by NewGuise; 18th February 10 at 07:28 PM.
Garrett
"Then help me for to kilt my clais..." Schir David Lindsay, Ane Satyre of the Thrie Estaitis
-
-
17th February 10, 12:15 PM
#48
 Originally Posted by Inchessi
Mitochondria are passed directly from the mother, they stop on the male side. i.e. You won't pass yours on, and your father didn't pass his on. Scientifically it makes sense to carry on your maternal name. oh, I got this useless piece of information in the first $8,000.
Well, for another $8,000 (or a nickel to me), you carry basically the same Y-chromosomal material as Adam in the garden of Eden, as that is passed down the male line exclusively. This is the basis of genetic genealogy. True, recombination and mutation have altered the Y chromosome over time, but because this is the archtypal gender-determining chromosome, changes are not often viable, so the gene sequence is relatively stable. The neat thing for men is that this should track your surname nicely. On the other hand, besides testosterone (and hairy ears), it isn't completely clear what the Y chromosome encodes for.
-
-
18th February 10, 06:14 PM
#49
You've been thinking about it quite a bit. I see no reason not to do it if you want to. My cousin's sons all from the same father have different surnames.
Son 1's surname = father's surname-mother's surname
Son 2's surname = father's surname
Son 3's surname = maternal grandmother's maiden name
Son 3 had a similar relationship with his father as you described and had always felt closer to his mother's (and my) side of the family. So he changed his name. Since then, he and his father have improved their relationship. But he likes his name.
Genealogically, it looks funny, but each individual is happy with his choice.
-
-
18th February 10, 08:01 PM
#50
 Originally Posted by Lyle1
You might use "Tobus Kilpatrick Nee Englishname" on your typed signature line, the sign it "Tobus Kilpatrick"
A small point. For a man it would be ne, not nee (either one being lower case). It's French for born, a language that I assume you don't speak. And there is an acute accent on the first (or only) letter e, but I don't know how to type that.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Stratherrick in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 41
Last Post: 23rd August 09, 09:02 AM
-
By NorCalPiper in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 12
Last Post: 12th February 08, 11:13 AM
-
By cessna152towser in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 1
Last Post: 6th April 07, 12:12 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks