Quote Originally Posted by Jock Scot View Post
Precisely! And we have gone full circle. What I take Mr Hawthorne to say is why not have a label saying "Scots kilt" meaning the same thing as "Scotch Whisky" and having the same legal meanings and sanctions. The non Scotch whisky producers from around the world---even China I gather, whilst perhaps not liking the distinction seem to get by perfectly well. Why not the same with kilts?
Yes, but what SHOULD the criteria be for a "Scots Kilt"? How "Scots" is enough to get that label? Should it be 100% of Scottish product? 90%? 50%?

I'm interested to hear your take on it, Jock. I think we agree that there could be a "Scots Kilt" label, but what would define it is would probably take issue with Mr. Hawthorne.