-
11th November 08, 09:32 AM
#11
Originally Posted by hospitaller
somebody forgot to inform Clan Young of that little detail...
Hector,
Gilmore is correct in his statement and is following Scots custom. If you search the Standing Council of Scottish Chief's web site, you should find no reference to a Chief of the Clan Young. However, the following article from electricscotland.com does shed some light on Clan Young's status with the Lyon Court:
http://www.electricscotland.com/webc...oz/young2.html
Many Scottish clans do not have a chief at present, yet this should not deminish the work of their clan societies; witness the Buchanan Society, one of the oldest clan societies (founded in the early 19th century in Scotland).
Regards,
Todd
-
-
11th November 08, 10:38 AM
#12
Originally Posted by cajunscot
Hector,
Gilmore is correct in his statement and is following Scots custom. If you search the Standing Council of Scottish Chief's web site, you should find no reference to a Chief of the Clan Young. However, the following article from electricscotland.com does shed some light on Clan Young's status with the Lyon Court:
http://www.electricscotland.com/webc...oz/young2.html
Many Scottish clans do not have a chief at present, yet this should not deminish the work of their clan societies; witness the Buchanan Society, one of the oldest clan societies (founded in the early 19th century in Scotland).
Regards,
Todd
That is my point Todd.
The Lord Lyon granted Clan Young the 'permission' to re-convene, thus there is a Clan Young, even though there is still no chief pending the administrative periods estipulated in order to find a rightful Chief.
So, based on Gilmore's statement (no chief no clan), someone forgot to mention that to the Lord Lyion and the Clan Young members (myself included), as there obviously is a Clan Young, even without a Chief (at the moment)
That is all.
-
-
11th November 08, 10:54 AM
#13
Originally Posted by hospitaller
That is my point Todd.
The Lord Lyon granted Clan Young the 'permission' to re-convene, thus there is a Clan Young, even though there is still no chief pending the administrative periods estipulated in order to find a rightful Chief.
So, based on Gilmore's statement (no chief no clan), someone forgot to mention that to the Lord Lyion and the Clan Young members (myself included), as there obviously is a Clan Young, even without a Chief (at the moment)
That is all.
All's well that end's well then. How was I to know, since you didn't mention this in your first post?
T.
-
-
11th November 08, 11:08 AM
#14
Originally Posted by gilmore
If there is no chief, there is no clan.
I belong to Clan MacGillivray, which currently has no chief.
-
-
11th November 08, 11:18 AM
#15
Originally Posted by jordanjm
I belong to Clan MacGillivray, which currently has no chief.
Information:
http://www.mcgillivray.us/chiefshipintro.html
Regards,
Todd
-
-
11th November 08, 11:36 AM
#16
Is there a thought here, by Gilmore, that the nature of Scottish clans can not have evolved from their old ways as the world has changed? In other words, the clans must be exactly the same as they were two or three hundred years ago or they do not exist.
I think both the word and the subject "clan" have changed over time as has the world.
The voice of Gilmore in my head may now smash my argument.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
11th November 08, 12:29 PM
#17
Originally Posted by gilmore
If there is no chief, there is no clan.
Not strictly true. Clan MacRae has not had a Chief for many years but still exisits. There was an attempt about 40 or so years ago by one of the branches to claim the Chieftain but it did not pass the Lord Lyons Court.
Brian
In a democracy it's your vote that counts; in feudalism, it's your Count that votes.
-
-
11th November 08, 12:54 PM
#18
Originally Posted by BEEDEE
Not strictly true. Clan MacRae has not had a Chief for many years but still exisits. There was an attempt about 40 or so years ago by one of the branches to claim the Chieftain but it did not pass the Lord Lyons Court.
Brian
Take a look at the list of clans here and the information just above it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_clan
-
-
11th November 08, 01:09 PM
#19
Wear what you want. Let no one tell you different. Anyone that does is a moron.
-
-
11th November 08, 01:28 PM
#20
Originally Posted by Dirk Skene
Wear what you want. Let no one tell you different. Anyone that does is a moron.
That's a pretty disrespectful statement, Dirk.
In the end, it's no skin off my nose what anyone chooses to wear in terms of tartan, but if someone asks me my "professional" opinion as a historian, I'm going to be honest and not tell them what they want to hear.
Todd
-
Similar Threads
-
By Jim H. in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 15
Last Post: 25th April 07, 07:24 AM
-
By auld argonian in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 3
Last Post: 24th January 07, 08:19 AM
-
By highlandcelt in forum The Heraldry Forum
Replies: 31
Last Post: 19th June 06, 08:01 PM
-
By oneride in forum Kilt Board Newbie
Replies: 28
Last Post: 23rd April 06, 12:30 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks