|
-
17th November 08, 09:18 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by AcuteEnigma
Now there you go. The very article you point to confirms that the Lord Lyon acknowledges the EXISTANCE of a clan with no chief.
"On May 16, 1989 Malcolm R. Innes of Edingight, CVO, WS Lord Lyon King of Arms Scotland, confirmed the right for Clan Young to have a Crest Badge for all members of Clan Young...."
Of course, the $64,000 question is the status of the Buchanan chiefship with the Lyon Court -- at present, the chiefship of Clan Buchanan is dormant, and to my knowledge, no commander has been appointed by the Lyon Court.
That being said, the Buchanan Society does have a fairly long history, being one of the first clan societies established in 1725, as I mentioned before.
I'm sure Rathdown or Sketraw could add to this discussion.
Regards,
Todd
-
-
11th November 08, 11:08 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by gilmore
If there is no chief, there is no clan.
I belong to Clan MacGillivray, which currently has no chief.
-
-
11th November 08, 11:18 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by jordanjm
I belong to Clan MacGillivray, which currently has no chief.
Information:
http://www.mcgillivray.us/chiefshipintro.html
Regards,
Todd
-
-
11th November 08, 12:29 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by gilmore
If there is no chief, there is no clan.
Not strictly true. Clan MacRae has not had a Chief for many years but still exisits. There was an attempt about 40 or so years ago by one of the branches to claim the Chieftain but it did not pass the Lord Lyons Court.
Brian
In a democracy it's your vote that counts; in feudalism, it's your Count that votes.
-
-
11th November 08, 12:54 PM
#5
 Originally Posted by BEEDEE
Not strictly true. Clan MacRae has not had a Chief for many years but still exisits. There was an attempt about 40 or so years ago by one of the branches to claim the Chieftain but it did not pass the Lord Lyons Court.
Brian
Take a look at the list of clans here and the information just above it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_clan
-
-
16th November 08, 07:30 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by gilmore
And the counterpart:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armigerous_clan
-
-
16th November 08, 07:06 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by gilmore
If there is no chief, there is no clan.
How can you say such nonsense?
?????
Wow. This really makes me angry.
[insert cuss words here]
-
-
10th November 08, 11:52 PM
#8
 Originally Posted by dowofbuchanan
so many people have posted that there are no kilt police and i know this. but i guess im just not that type of girl (im more of the large hairy Y chromosome girl) and those people where told if it means that much to them then write a letter to the clan chief asking for permission to wear the tartan. so how do i go about swearing loyalty to a clan without a chieftain
Look, I have Gilmore's voice in my head saying things every time joining a clan comes up, so "ya what he said."
Perhaps you could consider a clan change if this is something you feel you must do. I just saw something about the procedure in another thread.
Good luck.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
11th November 08, 12:09 AM
#9
To me, clans are interesting relics of centuries ago. The clan system was a viable way of life, a real, living entity, at one time, but that was a very long time ago. We may be descendants of those people, but we can never live like they did, and being "in a clan" can never be the same thing to us that it was to them.
In other words, I wouldn't worry about it.
-
-
11th November 08, 12:40 AM
#10
Please forgive me, I base my opinion off only one book I read on the subject, and naturaly with out more sources it can be construed as bias, but this answer on the subject is one that I have come to agree with:
It is a some what romantacized idea that in the highlands, the various clans would be able to identify eachother strickly by the pattern of thier tartan. It is equaly as romantacized that an entier clan would prescribe it self to one set ( or sets) of pattern. Often times you just had to wear what ever could be taylored.
Now, if you were the lord of a Castle, and just happend to be a Campbell, and you had an eye for a certian blue green tartan pattern, it was well within your economic scope to say "I want this pattern to be the official pattern of my castle". and it could be done. So if you worked for him, then you could be issued the Campbell pattern in what ever garment was worn.
Over time the patterns became known as the Campbell Tartan, and then though the years it somehow gets tied to the Campbell clain, and then somehow the idea of every Campbell wore this specific tartan color grew, and thats thats.
The further back you go in history the less importent wearing a specific type of pattern becomes.
Again this is just my interpretation.
To Summise, as long as you know the name of the tartan should anyone ask, and it matches your shirt, everything is kosher.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Jim H. in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 15
Last Post: 25th April 07, 07:24 AM
-
By auld argonian in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 3
Last Post: 24th January 07, 08:19 AM
-
By highlandcelt in forum The Heraldry Forum
Replies: 31
Last Post: 19th June 06, 08:01 PM
-
By oneride in forum Kilt Board Newbie
Replies: 28
Last Post: 23rd April 06, 12:30 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks