On changing one's name

[ThistleDown]

I'll just note that I did exactly that, without any hyphen, in order to acknowledge my mother and her side of the family along with my father and his side. And that was very, very easy to do ... although some forms are set up to recognize only one "middle" name or initial at most, in which case I end up going with first name and (my father's) surname - that is the one downside, but perhaps a notable one in your situation.

It's not actually a Scottish tradition to hyphenate surnames. I stand to be corrected (please) but I think that hyphenating surnames creates a new name. So Mr Sporran and Miss Purse marry and name themselves Mr and Mrs Sporran-Purse, thereby creating an entirely new and different surname, Sporran-Purse. In Scotland; I've no knowledge of the laws in the US.

I have a dear friend, however, whose uncle was the last in the male line of a landed family. My friend chose to dispense with his father's surname and replace it with his mother's (i.e., his uncle's). This was a relatively simple process in the US as I understand it. His uncle then named him as his successor and my friend has since been recognised by Lord Lyon with the territorial designation.

[Ancienne Alliance]

It's not actually a Scottish tradition to hyphenate surnames. I stand to be corrected (please) but I think that hyphenating surnames creates a new name. So Mr Sporran and Miss Purse marry and name themselves Mr and Mrs Sporran-Purse, thereby creating an entirely new and different surname, Sporran-Purse. In Scotland; I've no knowledge of the laws in the US.
.

Not wanting to high-jack this thread I would like to add that for ceremonial purposes like Clan certificates or brevets, etc. , I sometime use the full name version my ancestors bore. That makes it :
Robert Amyot de Villeneuve-Lincourt



Best,

Robert

[Chas]

In the UK there is neither shame nor honour attached to changing one's surname. It used to happen on a regular basis if there was an inheritance in the balance. Money, land or title. There is an accepted set of words that is included in a last will and testament called a 'Name and Arms Clause'. Many people grew up knowing that at the age of 21 (originally 25) they would have to choose; the name they were born with or the name that comes with title or land or wealth. The changing of surnames in the UK was so common at one time that there was a whole department set up in the Home Office (which still exists) just to deal with the titles and territorial designations. Even the King changed his surname from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to Windsor!

It doesn't matter what your reasons are. Life is too short to be unhappy. If it will bring you peace and contentment - do it.

Regards

Chas

[Riverkilt]

Boy, do I ever identify with you.

First, I didn't get to choose my name - it was issued to me by someone else.

And...I didn't get my own name, I got someone else's. I'm a junior.

Then in 1968 Ronald McDonald the clown was created to sell hamburgers and having the name Ronald Macdonald, Jr. became a nightmare of teasing and crank phone calls.

Then in 1978 my father died and I at least had the name to myself.

Seriously considered changing my name...and considered....and considered...and created a selection of names to adopt. Here in Arizona its only $15 and a simple court process to change your name if there's no malice intended.

Main reason for putting it off was not wanting to seperate from my Macdonald heritage. And as a genealogy buff would imagine the problems it might create for future generations. And was too stubborn to let some ad man force me into a name change just because he invented a clown with a name so similar to mine.

While I continued to consider changing my name I continued to age.
Now at 65 it seems like - what's the point.

So, my suggestion is make your decision soon so it doesn't drift away from you like it did for me.